Anytime Approximations of Classical Logic from Above
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this article we present s1, a family of logics that is useful to disprove propositional formulas by means of an anytime approximation process. The systems follows the paradigm of a parameterized family of logics established by Schaerf’s and Cadoli’s system S1. We show that s1 inherits several of the nice properties of S1, while presenting several attractive new properties. The family s1 deals with the full propositional language, has a complete tableau proof system which provides for incremental approximations; furthermore, it constitutes a full approximation of classical logic from above, with an approximation process with better relevance and locality properties than S1. When applied to clausal inference, s1 provides a strong simplification method. An application of s1 to model-based diagnosis is presented, demonstrating how the solution to this problem can benefit from the use of s1 approximations.
منابع مشابه
A Logic for Approximate First-Order Reasoning
In classical approaches to knowledge representation, reasoners are assumed to derive all the logical consequences of their knowledge base. As a result, reasoning in the first-order case is only semi-decidable. Even in the restricted case of finite universes of discourse, reasoning remains inherently intractable, as the reasoner has to deal with two independent sources of complexity: unbounded c...
متن کاملA Proof Theory for Tractable Approximations of Propositional Reasoning
This paper proposes an uniform framework for the proof theory of tractable approximations of propositional reasoning. The key idea is the introduction of approximate proofs. This makes possible the development of an approximating sequent calculus for propositional deduction where proofs can be sound, complete or multi-directional approximations of classical logic. We show how this calculus subs...
متن کاملComputing Approximate Diagnoses By Using Approximate Entailment
The most widely accepted models of diagnostic reasoning are all phrased in terms of the logical consequence relations. In work in recent years, Schaerf and Cadoli have proposed e cient approximations of the classical consequence relation. The central idea of this paper is to parameterise the notion of diagnosis over di erent approximations of the consequence relation. This yields a number of di...
متن کاملAnytime Reasoning in First-Order Logic
We propose a class of algorithms which gives bestefforts answers to problems in first-order logic given a bound on the resources available for reasoning. The algorithms in this class generate and attempt to solve S1 and S3 approximations to the input problem, then use the results to determine the most likely solution to the input problem. We show that an algorithm in this class outperforms theo...
متن کاملComputational Complexity and Anytime Algorithm for Inconsistency Measurement
Measuring inconsistency degrees of inconsistent knowledge bases is an important problem as it provides context information for facilitating inconsistency handling. Many methods have been proposed to solve this problem and a main class of them is based on some kind of paraconsistent semantics. In this paper, we consider the computational aspects of inconsistency degrees of propositional knowledg...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Log. Comput.
دوره 17 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007